Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40483632›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2025

The impact of exercise and psychotherapy on psychosocial outcomes for patients with chronic pain.

Mizuyuki Nakamura, Yoshiyasu Hattammaru, Ayano Oiwa, Takayuki Hamaguchi, Yukino Tairako, Jiro Kurata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mizuyuki NakamuraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Clinic, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi 3-25-8, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyasu HattammaruDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Clinic, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi 3-25-8, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. h-marumaru@jikei.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8034-393X
Ayano OiwaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Clinic, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi 3-25-8, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki HamaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Clinic, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi 3-25-8, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukino TairakoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Clinic, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi 3-25-8, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Jiro KurataDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Clinic, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi 3-25-8, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of patients with chronic pain and differences in their responses to different treatment approaches.

methodsA retrospective review was performed regarding patients with chronic pain who visited an interdisciplinary pain treatment centre between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2023. The patients were categorised into four groups based on the treatment received: a conventional therapy group treated by medical doctors, an exercise therapy group received additional exercise therapy, a psychotherapy group received additional psychotherapy, and an interdisciplinary treatment group received additional exercise therapy and psychotherapy. Responses to pain-related and psychosocial questionnaire results were compared between baseline and six months post-treatment.

resultsOf the 1,967 initial participants, 239 patients met the eligibility criteria and their data were included in the analysis. In the Conventional therapy group, the indicators showed improvement in pain symptoms, excluding the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D) scores. In the Exercise therapy group, significant improvements in PSEQ (from 28.15 to 33.34, p < 0.001) and HADS-D (from 7.17 to 6.35, p = 0.035) scores were documented. HADS-Anxiety scores decreased in the Psychotherapy group from 10.36 to 7.91 (p = 0.028). The Interdisciplinary treatment group showed a significant reduction in pain catastrophizing scale scores (from 35.15 to 26.31, p = 0.038).

conclusionsThis study indicated that exercise therapy, psychotherapy, and interdisciplinary approaches might contribute to improvements in psychosocial outcomes amongst patients with chronic pain. Although the effects of exercise therapy were more consistent, psychotherapy and interdisciplinary treatment demonstrated potential benefits.

Indexed as

Chronic PainExercise TherapyPain ManagementPsychotherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeChronic painExercise therapyPatient-reported measurements outcomesPsychotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.