Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40483546›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Artificial intelligence-driven circRNA vaccine development: multimodal collaborative optimization and a new paradigm for biomedical applications.

Yan Zhao, Huaiyu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Animal virus-host interactions mediated by non-coding RNAs.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. IRES-Mediated Translation: Expanding the Toolkits of RNA Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yan ZhaoDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China.
Huaiyu WangDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circular RNA (circRNA) vaccines have emerged as a groundbreaking innovation in infectious disease prevention and cancer immunotherapy, offering superior stability and reduced immunogenicity compared to conventional linear messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. While linear mRNA vaccines are prone to degradation and can trigger strong innate immune responses, covalently closed circRNA vaccines leverage their unique circular structure to enhance molecular stability and minimize innate immune activation, positioning them as a next-generation platform for vaccine development. Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing circRNA vaccine design and optimization. Deep learning models, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformers, integrate multi-omics data to refine antigen prediction, RNA secondary structure modeling, and lipid nanoparticle delivery system formulation, surpassing traditional bioinformatics approaches in both accuracy and efficiency. While AI-driven bioinformatics enhances antigen screening and delivery system modeling, generative AI accelerates literature synthesis and experimental planning-though the risk of fabricated references and limited biological interpretability hinders its reliability. Despite these advancements, challenges such as the "black-box" nature of AI algorithms, unreliable literature retrieval, and insufficient integration of biological mechanisms underscore the necessity for a hybrid "AI-traditional-experimental" paradigm. This approach integrates explainable AI frameworks, multi-omics validation, and ethical oversight to ensure clinical translatability. Future research should prioritize mechanism-driven AI models, real-time experimental feedback, and rigorous ethical standards to fully unlock the potential of circRNA vaccines in precision oncology and global health.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRNA, CircularVaccine DevelopmentComputational BiologyHumansRNA, Circularartificial intelligencebioinformatics AIcircRNA vaccinedeep learninggenerative AI

Identifiers

PMID40483546
PMCPMC12145227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.