ReviewJournal of cannabis research2025
Revealing the therapeutic potential of synthetic cannabinoids: a systematic review of cannabinoid receptor binding dynamics and their implications for cancer therapy.
Review in Journal of cannabis research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cannabinoids in Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms of Tumor Cell Death and Translational Opportunities.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Unraveling Endocannabinoid Signaling Pathways in Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Rational design of click-assembled chiral dendrimers: anticancer activity and molecular dynamics study.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Genetically Encoded CBInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- CBD Disrupts Malme-3M Cell Metabolism via Glycolytic Shift and Redox Imbalance.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- The potential role of cannabidiol (CBD) in lung cancer therapy: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer remains a major global health issue, prompting the need for innovative treatment approaches that extend beyond conventional methods such as chemotherapy and radiation. The endocannabinoid system (ECS), primarily the cannabinoid receptors CB1R and CB2R, presents a promising opportunity for cancer therapy by selectively targeting cell signaling pathways. This systematic review intends to explore the mode of action of synthetic cannabinoids as potential anticancer agents and their impact on tumor growth in various cancer cell lines.
methodsOf the 287 articles identified between January 1990 and July 2024, 27 studies met strict criteria focusing on their anticancer effects. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using GRADE criteria and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, ensuring robust evaluation of the studies' reliability.
resultsVarious pharmacological actions of synthetic cannabinoids function as agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists at the CB1R and CB2R receptors. Key findings indicate that CB2R agonists significantly reduce cancer cell proliferation through diverse mechanisms, with selective CB2R agonists effectively inhibiting cancer cell growth and survival. Studies involving CB1R antagonists, particularly in conjunction with CB2R agonists, highlight their role in blocking CB1R to either validate or enhance the efficacy of CB2R agonists in mitigating tumor growth. Inverse agonists targeting CB2R have shown moderate success in inducing cancer cell death by disrupting survival pathways. Notably, synthetic cannabinoid agonists display significant potential in targeting CB1 and CB2 receptors to inhibit tumor proliferation and promote apoptosis across various cancer types.
conclusionThe systematic review concludes that CB2R agonists can effectively inhibit tumor growth while inducing apoptosis in various cancers. Although CB1R agonists show potential in modulating cancer pathways, there is a notable lack of research on CB1 inverse agonists, emphasizing the need for further investigation. Additionally, the study advocates for greater exploration of mixed receptor agonist and receptor mode of action to validate these promising therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.