Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40483534›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2025

Comparison between INTERGROWTH-21ST and Fenton charts for extrauterine growth in very low birth weigth infants.

Ilkyaz Turktan, Omer Erdeve, Ezgi Kostekci, Emel Okulu, Begum Atasay, Saadet Arsan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilkyaz TurktanDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. zeybekilkyaz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-9122
Omer ErdeveDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ezgi KostekciDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Emel OkuluDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Begum AtasayDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Saadet ArsanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growth of premature infants is expected to be equivalent to healthy fetal growth, but this is rarely achieved in practice. It is predicted that many premature infants, especially severe premature infants, will be discharged with growth restriction. Extrauterine growth retardation (EUGR) is defined as growth below the 10th percentile of the growth curve at discharge at corrected 36th/40th week of gestation, or a difference between birth and discharge z-score > 1 SD. The aim of our study is to determine the differences between the INTERGROWTH-21ST and the Fenton chart in the assessment of extrauterine growth.

methodsInfants < 1500 g born or transferred in the first 24 h at Ankara University NICU between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 were included. Infants with major congenital anomalies, unknown gestational age, chromosomal anomalies, hydrops fetalis, TORCH infection, infants born to substance abusing mothers, and infants who died during hospitalization were excluded.

resultsAccording to the Fenton, the rate of EUGR at discharge was 66.3%. There was no significant difference between the groups EUGR and non-EUGR in gender, gestational diabetes, maternal smoking during pregnancy, placental abruption, magnesium sulphate prophylaxis, development of respiratory distress, and need for intubation in the first 3 days after birth. When patients were grouped according to birth weight, the highest rate of EUGR according to the Fenton was found in the group with a birth weight ≤ 1000 g (78.8%) (p = 0.036). The proportion of patients defined as SGA by INTERGROWTH-21ST was significantly higher than by Fenton (p < 0.001). Comparing the mean z scores for body weight, height and head circumference at birth and discharge calculated from the Fenton and INTERGROWTH-21 charts, the z scores for body weight and height at birth and discharge were significantly lower in the INTERGROWTH-21 (p < 0.001). Head circumference z-scores at birth and discharge were found to be higher in the Fenton chart than in the INTERGROWTH-21ST (p < 0.001). When EUGR rates were evaluated by body weight in Fenton and INTERGROWTH-21ST, the EUGR rate was found to be higher in Fenton (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe results show that when INTERGROWTH-21ST and Fenton are compared, INTERGROWTH-21ST is more sensitive in defining the SGA rate. The Fenton is more sensitive in defining EUGR at discharge. These differences between the charts make it difficult to monitor the growth of premature infants and to follow comorbidities. Therefore, the establishment of ideal growth curves is of great importance both during hospitalization and after discharge of premature infants.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationGrowth ChartsInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesTurkeyExtrauterin growth retardationFenton chartINTERGROWTH-21STSmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID40483534
PMCPMC12145624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.