Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2025
Dose-dependent side effects of prehospital analgesia with ketamine for winter sports injuries - an observational study.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKetamine is one of the most used drugs in trauma patients after skiing accidents. However, the environmental conditions for these patients are often rough, with numerous unpleasant sensory impressions (e.g. noise from the helicopter, cold, wind, etc.), raising concerns about the adverse psychological side effects of ketamine. Moreover, it has not yet been established whether these side effects are dose-dependent, and the supplementary administration of benzodiazepines remains controversial. We analysed the subjective perception of side effects after administration of ketamine during helicopter emergency medical service missions involving trauma patients after ski accidents.
methodsIn this retrospective observational study, data was collected from emergency services protocols and questionnaires filled out by patients. The primary outcome was defined as the patients' subjective perceptions of ketamine-associated side effects. The subjective intensity of twelve common classes of side effects was recorded on a five-point Likert scale. In addition, we conducted a linear regression analysis, with side effect intensity as the outcome and gender, age, type of injury, use of midazolam and fentanyl, ketamine dosage and relative pain reduction as covariates.
resultsA total of 69 patients were identified who were treated with ketamine during the winter months of 2023/2024, after suffering trauma while doing alpine winter sports. Of these, 49 patients (71%) could be included. The side effects reported were mostly mild, with two-thirds of the patients describing them as "no [side effects]" or "mild". Only 6% described them as "barely tolerable" or "unbearable". No statistically significant association could be demonstrated between the ketamine dose and the total reported side effect score. The regression model identified the additional administration of midazolam as a significant covariate for fewer side effects. With regard to prehospital care, 85% of the patients stated that they had always felt safe, while two-thirds were satisfied with the prehospital pain therapy.
conclusionKetamine seems to be a suitable option for pain therapy in the case of injuries during alpine winter sport activities. Side effects reported by patients in this study were rare, not dose-dependent and described by most patients as subjectively well tolerable. The supplementary administration of midazolam could potentially further reduce these side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.