Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Age-differentiated comparison of health-related quality of life and impacting factors in patients with COPD receiving long-term home non-invasive ventilation.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a well-established treatment for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF). While studies have demonstrated benefits for mortality, hospitalization rates, and health related quality of life (HRQL), evidence is particularly sparse regarding HRQL determinants in the older population.
methodsIn a prospective, monocentric observational study, HRQL was assessed using the established Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI). The study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 17 June 2015 under the registration number DRKS00008759. Patients were categorized into two age-based groups: older patients (≥ 65 years) and younger patients (< 65 years). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to analyze factors on HRQL, including SRI scores, anemia, autonomy impairment, exacerbation history and other factors.
results237 Patients with COPD with CHRF receiving NIV therapy were included. The mean SRI summary score was 49.9 ± 16.8. with 23.2% (N = 55) suffering from anemia and 36.7% (N = 87) experiencing ≥ 2 exacerbations annually. Autonomy impairment was observed in 49.4% (N = 117) of patients. The updated Charlson Comorbidity Index (uCCI) was 2.2 ± 1.86. No significant differences were found in SRI Summary Scale scores between age groups (p = 0.581), but notable disparities were present in the uCCI (p = 0.014). Multiple regression analysis revealed a negative association of exacerbation history (Young group: -9.2; 95% CI = -14.8/ -3.55 vs. Older group: -6.17; 95% CI = -11.91/ -0.43) and level of autonomy impairment (e.g. Level of Care 2 Young group: -13.91; 95% CI = -21.4/ -6.43 vs. Older group: -14.94; 95% CI = -22.64/ -7.24) on SRI scores with age-related differences. Anemia only had a negative association on the SRI scores in younger patients with COPD (Young group: -7.9; 95% CI = -14.0/ -1.75 vs. Older group: -1.78; 95% CI = -9.21/ 5.65). DISCUSSION: Frequent exacerbations and a higher level of autonomy impairment had a negative association on HRQL across all ages. However only higher levels of impairment (≥ 2) have a detrimental impact on older patients. Anemia was a negative HRQL factor in younger patients, where it was more prevalent. Overall, HRQL was found to be comparably favorable in both older and younger patients, despite age-specific differences in influencing factors. REGISTRATION OF THE CLINICAL TRIAL: The study from which the data were analyzed was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00008759) on June 17, 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.