ArticleBMC primary care2025
Patients' and clinicians' experiences of DIALOG+ in primary health care in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a qualitative interview study using thematic analysis.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Perspectives on a Digital Therapeutic for Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Evaluation of an App for Negative Symptoms.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDIALOG + is a low-cost intervention proven to improve the subjective quality of life in patients with psychosis and anxiety disorders in low- and middle-income countries. In a recent study, DIALOG + was shown to be feasible for patients in primary care settings with long-term physical conditions and to result in an improvement in patient outcomes. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences of patients and clinicians using DIALOG + in Bosnia and Herzegovina to gain a better understanding of its impact in this setting.
methodsIn-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients and 4 physicians, as well as two focus groups with 5 patients in each, all of whom participated in the intervention. Specific life and treatment domains discussed during the sessions between patients and clinicians were also analysed to determine which domains were most frequently addressed and where patients needed the most support. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsFour qualitative themes were identified: (1) DIALOG + structure and solution-oriented approach are helpful; (2) DIALOG + allows space for conversation; (3) Therapeutic relationship is improved, and (4) The intervention has its limitations.
conclusionsDIALOG + is a novel primary care intervention with positive effects on patients' lives, which enhance primary care. Nevertheless, it presents a new challenge in this setting. It is necessary to make adjustments in primary care, such as providing clinicians with more extensive training and ongoing support, as well as providing more time for the intervention's implementation.
trial registrationStudy was registered prospectively within the ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN17003451, 02/12/2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.