ReviewBMC anesthesiology2025
A complication of double-lumen endotracheal tubes resulting in delayed laryngeal injury and dyspnea: a case report and literature analysis.
Review in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDouble-lumen endotracheal tubes(DLTs) is often used in lung surgery and is more likely to cause throat injury than single-lumen endotracheal tubes. However, it is rare to have an occult giant laryngeal cyst and upper airway obstruction after DLTs, causing severe complications such as dyspnea. This serious complication endangers the patient's life and safety. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old woman underwent surgical resection of a lung tumor under DLTs. Approximately 3 months after surgery, she went to the hospital for treatment due to hoarseness and dyspnea after a change in body position. Laryngoscopy revealed that the upper airway was obstructed due to a large cyst in the throat, which required surgical resection. Although the crisis was resolved by surgical resection, this serious complication of endotracheal intubation, which could have endangered the patient's life, was indeed worrisome.
conclusionsThe DLTs is thick, and the positioning of the intubation technology is high, which increases the likelihood of a throat injury. Thus, it is necessary to actively prevent its occurrence during operation. Hoarseness after operation needs early examination to detect and treat the injury early and avoid such serious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.