ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Characterisation of a large, single-centre cohort of patients with Becker muscular dystrophy to inform standardised care guidelines.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Capture the Patient Experience of Becker Muscular Dystrophy.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Effects of sevasemten (EDG-5506) on safety, biomarkers, and functional measures in adults with Becker muscular dystrophy: results of a phase 1b, open-label study.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Value of Muscle MRI in a Case of Very Late-Onset Becker Muscular Dystrophy.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Respiratory function in Becker muscular dystrophy: a comprehensive longitudinal study.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study aimed to characterise a large cohort of paediatric and adult patients with Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) to inform clinical care.
resultsThe analysis included data from 163 male patients with genetically confirmed BMD followed up at a highly specialised neuromuscular centre between 1982 and 2023. The mean age at last neuromuscular assessment was 33.2 years (range 1.4-86.3). Large deletions in the DMD gene were the most common variants (78% of cases), followed by large duplications and small variants, each accounting for 11% of cases. BMD diagnosis was prompted by skeletal muscle symptoms in 52.2% of cases, a positive family history in 27.6%, neuropsychiatric issues or diagnoses in 9.7%, incidental findings in 6.7%, and cardiomyopathy in 3.8%. Twenty-three percent of patients were non-ambulant at last evaluation, with a mean age at loss of ambulation (LoA) of 42.2 years (range 11.2-77.6 years). Disease duration correlated with the severity of motor impairment (expressed as fully ambulant, ambulant with limitation, ambulant with aids, non-ambulant) at last assessment. Cardiac involvement was observed in 52.3% of patients. Severe respiratory impairment was rare and more prevalent in non-ambulant patients. Neuropsychiatric issues were common (44.2%), but only 18.4% of patients had a formal diagnosis.
conclusionsRetrospective analyses of clinical case records contribute to improved understanding of the variability of phenotypes of BMD. Combined with data from other large cohorts, these findings can contribute to the development of standard of care guidelines for BMD and inform the design of clinical trials of novel therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.