ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Timing and intraindividual variability of daytime napping and Alzheimer's disease in older adults.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sleep fragmentation correlates with amyloid beta deposition at brain autopsy.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Objectively Measured Daytime Napping Patterns and All-Cause Mortality in Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Systematic Review on the Association Between Sleep and the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease: An Evolutionary Perspective.Evolutionary applications · 2026Review
- Sleep disturbances and Alzheimer's disease: a multiscale approach from exposome to neurobiology and precision medicine.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Sleep and neurocognitive performance in middle-aged Latina women in a rural agricultural community: insights from the CHAMACOS Maternal Cognition Study.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExcessive daytime napping has been associated with neurodegeneration in older adults, but prior research has focused on nap duration and frequency. Emerging frameworks emphasize the multidimensionality of sleep, but it remains unknown whether other dimensions of napping (e.g., timing, variability) are linked to neurodegeneration. To address this gap, we investigated the associations of daytime nap timing and intraindividual variability of nap duration with incident Alzheimer's dementia and Alzheimer's disease pathology.
methodsWe analyzed data from 936 older adults (age range: 56-99; 77% female) in the Rush Memory and Aging Project to examine incident Alzheimer's dementia and from 320 deceased participants (age range at death: 71-105; 70% female) to examine Alzheimer's pathology. The proportions of morning (9-11am) and early afternoon naps (1-3 pm) and the intraindividual variability of nap duration were assessed using actigraphy. Participants completed neurological assessments at baseline and annually for up to 17 years. In deceased participants, amyloid β and neurofibrillary tangles were examined.
resultsHere we show that more morning naps are linked to a higher risk of Alzheimer's dementia, whereas more early afternoon naps are linked to reduced amyloid β levels. Higher intraindividual variability of nap duration is shown to be associated with increased amyloid β and neurofibrillary tangles.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that specific timing patterns and irregularities in daytime napping are linked to Alzheimer's disease risk and pathology. Multi-dimensional assessments of nap behaviors may aid in risk stratification for neurocognitive impairment and offer a potential target for interventions aimed at promoting healthy cognitive aging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.