Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40482214›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Medigap Protection and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees With Cancer.

Youngmin Kwon, Shelley A Jazowski, Xin Hu, Emma M Achola, John A Graves, Laura M Keohane, Stacie B Dusetzina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Youngmin KwonDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Shelley A JazowskiDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Xin HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia.
Emma M AcholaDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
John A GravesDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Laura M KeohaneDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Stacie B DusetzinaDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

AHRQ HHS T32 HS026122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: An increasing number of Medicare beneficiaries with cancer report Medicare Advantage (MA) coverage, but certain features of MA (eg, utilization management) may impede access to cancer care. MA beneficiaries may desire to switch to traditional Medicare (TM), which imposes little to no utilization restrictions, but switching may be challenging because access to Medigap-providing financial protections against high cost sharing in TM-is limited by medical underwriting of beneficiaries applying after initial Medicare enrollment in most states. Objective: To examine associations of Medigap guaranteed issue protections that prohibit medical underwriting with MA disenrollment among beneficiaries newly diagnosed with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study examined Medicare beneficiaries 69 years and older who were newly diagnosed with cancer from 2014 to 2019 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-linked Medicare database. Beneficiaries continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B for 4 years before to 1 year after diagnosis were included. Data were analyzed from October 2024 to April 2025. Exposure: A new cancer diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was switching to TM. Among those who were initially enrolled in MA, a difference-in-differences design was implemented to compare changes in the probability of MA disenrollment between beneficiaries diagnosed in 3 guaranteed issue states (New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts) vs other 13 states contributing to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registry, before and after diagnosis. Results: The study included 180 057 MA beneficiaries 69 years and older who were newly diagnosed with cancer (44.5% diagnosed at age 69-75 years; 51.5% male; 8.0% Hispanic; 7.4% non-Hispanic Black; 78.5% non-Hispanic White; and 6.1% another or unknown race and ethnicity). The rate of switching in guaranteed issue states increased from 2.1% to 4.7% following diagnosis but remained unchanged in other states (1.8% to 1.7%), corresponding to a difference-in-differences of 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, 1.9-3.2 percentage points; P < .001), or a 120% relative change. This differential increase was concentrated among beneficiaries who were younger, non-Hispanic White, diagnosed with distant-stage or rarer cancers, or enrolled in plans with more generous coverage (eg, PPO plans) or lower plan star ratings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, state Medigap guaranteed issue protections were associated with higher rates of switching to TM among MA beneficiaries newly diagnosed with cancer. These findings underscore the protective association of state Medigap regulations in facilitating a switch to TM (especially among beneficiaries who likely desired more flexibility in accessing and receiving care) and illuminate potential disparities in switching that may reflect unequal abilities to compare and afford plans.

Indexed as

Insurance, MedigapMedicare Part CNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMedicareRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40482214
PMCPMC12145528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.