Observational studyAnnals of Saudi medicine
Trends in pain management of sickle cell disease patients presenting with acute vasoocclusive crises: a multi-center retrospective study in Saudi Arabia.
Observational study in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic condition characterized by acute vaso-occlusive crisis (AVOC), which is the primary cause of emergency department (ED) visits for SCD patients. Despite recommendations for opioid use to manage AVOC pain, regional variations and biases in pain management persist, particularly in Saudi Arabia, where the prevalence of SCD varies by region.
objectiveTo identify national trends in pain management for AVOC in EDs across Saudi Arabia and analyze the duration and frequency of ED visits.
designA multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Multiple acute care centers in Saudi Arabia under the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, including EDs and urgent care centers in Riyadh, Jeddah, Al-Ahsa, Dhahran, and Medina. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 421 SCD patients presenting with AVOC between 2016 and 2021 were included. Patients with other complications such as infections or acute chest syndrome were excluded. Data on patient demographics, ED visit frequency, length of stay, and medications administered were collected.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes were the duration and frequency of ED visits and the types and frequency of analgesics administered. SAMPLE SIZE: The study included 421 patients accounting for 20 508 ED visits.
resultsThe average length of stay per ED visit was 4.7 hours. Morphine was the most frequently used opioid, administered to 86% of patients, while paracetamol was the most commonly used analgesic overall (93%). Regional differences were observed, with less opioid use in the Eastern region, where the disease is less severe due to haplotype variations. Ketamine was used in 13% of cases, predominantly in the Western region.
conclusionsThe study highlights a diverse approach to AVOC management across Saudi Arabia, with variations influenced by regional differences and physician practices. Paracetamol and morphine were the primary analgesics, though disparities in opioid use suggest the need for standardized pain management protocols. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited to centers under one organization and excluded patients with coexisting conditions, which may limit generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.