ReviewExpert review of molecular diagnostics2025
Primary open-angle glaucoma: a perspective from plasma metabolomics.
Review in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrimary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is an optic neuropathy, characterized by progressive loss of visual field, loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and optic nerve damage. The diagnosis and management of POAG involves tests such as static perimetry, tonometry and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to track progressive structural and functional changes. All these methods have limitations. Advancements in the discovery of metabolomic plasma-derived biomarkers may improve clinical outcomes, through identifying susceptible individuals, predicting disease progression, and assessing treatment efficacy in POAG. AREAS COVERED: We reviewed the current state of POAG management, identified limitations and need for biomarkers that could potentially fill the gap and current landscape of POAG plasma metabolomics, providing an overview of future potential biomarkers. EXPERT OPINION: Advances in the identification of metabolomic biomarkers can improve current clinical practices. These biomarkers can complement existing diagnostic tools, allowing for earlier detection and personalized treatment strategies. However, challenges remain, including a lack of standardization in metabolomics protocols, variability in disease progression and finally, recording treatment non-response currently also suffers from a lack of standardization toward depicting treatment outcomes. Future research should focus on standardizing procedures, increasing diversity in study populations, and conducting longitudinal studies to validate biomarkers in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.