ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2025
Influence of Lipstick Application on the Attractiveness of Smile in Women With and Without Malocclusions: An Eye-Tracking Study.
Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When does Orthodontics make a difference? Threshold effects in attractiveness perception and hiring intentions.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of cosmetics, particularly lipstick, has historically enhanced facial appeal. This study evaluates laypeople's perceptions of the attractiveness and employability of two female models from different age groups, each with varying malocclusions, both with and without lipstick. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study involved 77 lay participants who assessed digitally edited photographs of young and older female models with varying malocclusions (IOTN 1, 3 and 5), each shown with and without red lipstick. Eye-tracking technology and questionnaires were used to evaluate perceptions of attractiveness and employability. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc tests, and Pearson's chi-squared test.
resultsIOTN 1 with lipstick was rated 49.71 ± 25.74 and without lipstick 47.88 ± 25.44. These were significantly higher than IOTN 3 with lipstick (40.62 ± 24.16; p = 0.015), IOTN 3 without lipstick (39.23 ± 23.85; p = 0.002), IOTN 5 with lipstick (34.25 ± 24.77; p < 0.001) and IOTN 5 without lipstick (31.39 ± 23.30; p < 0.001). Employability ratings also varied significantly when comparing IOTN 1 and IOTN 5 images (p < 0.001). Eye-tracking heat maps revealed that the mouth was the primary area of visual focus across all conditions, regardless of lipstick use.
conclusionMalocclusion significantly impacts visual attention and attractiveness perception, with the mouth being the primary focus. While lipstick influences attention dispersion, it does not shift the main focus from the mouth. Heat map analysis confirmed that the mouth area remains the primary focus across all images, regardless of lipstick use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.