Observational studyCNS drugs2025
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intranasal Diacetylmorphine in Heroin-Assisted Treatment for Severe Opioid Use Disorder.
Observational study in CNS drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Intranasal Mucosal Atomiser Devices: A Novel Harm Reduction Intervention.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
- Interpretive Reference Ranges for Plasma Drug Concentrations in Acute Recreational Drug Toxicity: A Short Communication.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntranasal diacetylmorphine (IN DAM) represents a promising new route of administration, which is currently under investigation as a novel treatment approach for opioid use disorder in Switzerland. This study characterized the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutically relevant intranasal doses of DAM and its metabolites in patients with severe opioid use disorder.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, patients on intranasal heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) in Basel, Switzerland, self-administered their usual dose of IN DAM before receiving their daily maintenance dose. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years and current participation in IN HAT. Plasma concentrations of diacetylmorphine, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide, and morphine-3-glucuronide were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry at baseline and at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120, and 180 min. Acute subjective effects and cravings were assessed repeatedly using visual analog scales, withdrawal symptoms were measured using the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale, and autonomic responses were recorded over the 3 h after IN DAM administration.
resultsIn total, 14 patients were included in the study. The mean self-administered IN DAM dose was 346 mg (range 190-700 mg) delivered over a mean time of 3.8 min (range 1-9 min). IN DAM elicited moderate-to-strong peak drug effects, with marked reductions in heroin craving and withdrawal symptoms. No clinically relevant respiratory depression or decrease in oxygenation saturation was observed. Subjective effects occurred rapidly within the first 2 min after the start of administration. These effects gradually increased and peaked at 30-35 min, which paralleled the rising plasma concentrations of DAM and 6-MAM, while the sustained heroin-like effects best correlated with morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide plasma concentrations. Plasma half-lives of diacetylmorphine and 6-monoacetylmorphine were longer, and time to maximal plasma concentration was later than previously reported, suggesting saturated absorption at high intranasal doses and volumes.
conclusionsIN DAM has a good safety profile and should be considered as an effective alternative for patients in HAT, offering rapid onset of effects without significant side effects. Optimization of intranasal delivery may further improve absorption and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.