ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2025
Uncovering the efficacy of a natural homemade sunscreen in protection from ultraviolet radiation.
Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Rise in Homemade Sunscreen Trends and Future Impacts on Skin Cancer Risk: Systematic Review.JMIR dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Sun protection: a practical guide for health professionals.Australian prescriber · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Australia, skin cancer has the highest incidence of all cancer types, where Therapeutic Goods Association-approved, broad-spectrum sunscreens are recommended to prevent skin carcinogenesis. Commercial sunscreen ingredients, however, have been associated with negative impacts on human health, animal health and the environment. Together, the perceived harmful effects of commercial sunscreens have driven a trend towards home formulation of natural sunscreens, recipes for which are widely available online. Scientific evidence to support the efficacy of natural sunscreens, however, is lacking. We tested the efficacy of a natural homemade sunscreen (NHSS) published online by a wellness blogger with the aim to determine its photoprotective properties, beyond its ability to protect against erythema, compared to a commercially available SPF50 + sunscreen. The NHSS contained almond oil, coconut oil, shea butter, beeswax, red raspberry seed oil, carrot seed oil and zinc oxide. Skin explants were treated with either a commercial SPF50 + sunscreen, NHSS or base lotion prior to ultraviolet irradiation. Skin explants were assessed using immunohistochemistry for the levels of UVR-induced DNA damage in the form of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 8-oxo-7, 8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, as well as for sunburn cells and epidermal thickness. We demonstrate herein that NHSSs can reduce UVR-induced DNA damage and epidermal thickness, but do not effectively protect against the generation of sunburn cells. In comparison, SPF50 + sunscreen provided effective protection against all investigated parameters. These factors, however, are markers of short-term UVR-induced damage and there is as yet no evidence for NHSSs in prevention of skin carcinogenesis. Therefore, we recommend the continued use of TGA-approved commercial sunscreens for sun protection. Further studies are required to test water resistance, variation in homemade formulation, shelf life, and protection against skin carcinogenesis in a chronic UVR model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40481984What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.