Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481969›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

Listeners are biased towards voices of young speakers and female speakers when discriminating voices.

Valeriia Vyshnevetska, Nathalie Giroud, Meike Ramon, Volker Dellwo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valeriia VyshnevetskaLinguistic Research Infrastructure, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050, Zurich, Switzerland. valeriia.vyshnevetska@uzh.ch.ORCID 0009-0003-3355-9580
Nathalie GiroudLinguistic Research Infrastructure, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050, Zurich, Switzerland.
Meike RamonApplied Face Cognition Lab, Business School, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
Volker DellwoDepartment of Computational Linguistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 185399Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 185715Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PCEFP1_186841Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PR00P1 179872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In face processing, an own-age recognition advantage has frequently been reported whereby observers are better at recognizing faces of their own compared to other age groups. We wanted to know whether own-age effects exist in voice recognition. Two listener groups, younger adults (n = 42, 19-35 years, 21 males) and older adults (n = 32, 65-83 years, 14 males), completed a speaker discrimination task (same/different speakers), which included younger and older adult speakers of both sexes. Results revealed no interaction of the factors speaker and listener age and speaker and listener sex on listeners' sensitivity (d'). Main effects were significant for listener age (young adult listeners exhibited higher sensitivity than the older adult listeners) and speaker sex (listeners' sensitivity was higher for male compared to female voices). Crucially, response bias (c) revealed that listeners had a significantly higher 'same' bias when hearing younger speakers and female speakers. Our findings have implications for theories of voice identity processing and forensic contexts requiring discrimination of speakers' identity, e.g. earwitnesses telling apart younger and female speakers.

Indexed as

AgingDiscrimination, PsychologicalRecognition, PsychologySpeech PerceptionVoiceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsYoung AdultOwn-age effectResponse biasSpeaker recognition

Identifiers

PMID40481969
PMCPMC12145377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.