Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481951›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Updates in interventional cardiology in children with cardiac disease.

Kamel Shibbani, Damien Kenny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kamel ShibbaniUniversity of Iowa Children's Hospital, Iowa, USA. kshibbani@uiowa.edu.
Damien KennyOur Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of pediatric and congenital interventional cardiology is advancing rapidly, with recent innovations such as patent ductus arteriosus closure in premature infants, expanded options for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, ductal stenting for ductal-dependent lesions, and the development of novel, pediatric-specific devices. Despite these advancements, significant variability in care persists across centers, largely due to the absence of standardized guidelines. This gap can be addressed through the use of registries and multicenter studies, which offer evidence-based insights into optimal management strategies for congenital heart disease.

conclusionThis review aims to spotlight emerging procedures and devices used in the catheterization lab, presenting clinically relevant data on cutting-edge transcatheter interventions. Additionally, we discuss areas of ongoing debate and propose future research directions to further refine and standardize pediatric interventional cardiology practices. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Transcatheter procedures in congenital heart disease are growing in breadth and complexity. WHAT IS NEW: • There is significant variability in management strategies within pediatric interventional cardiology that can be addressed using registries and multicenter studies. • Novel devices like new self-expanding pulmonary valves, bioresorbable stents, and pediatric specific devices are being developed.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCardiologyHeart Defects, CongenitalChildHumansInfant, NewbornStentsCardiac diseaseCongenital heart diseaseTranscatheter interventions

Identifiers

PMID40481951
PMCPMC12145324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.