ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Effect of photodynamic therapy with natural photosensitizers on microleakage of class V composite restorations in primary teeth.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the impact of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using natural photosensitizers-curcumin, riboflavin, and phycocyanin-on microleakage in Class V restorations of primary teeth, clarifying the comparative effectiveness of each compound. This in vitro study was conducted on 76 extracted primary molars with sound buccal and lingual surfaces, randomly divided into four groups (n = 19). Class V cavities were prepared and treated with either no photosensitizer (control) or PDT inclding curcumin, riboflavin, or phycocyanin. The photosensitizers were applied using a syringe passively for 5 min and underwent laser irradiation (Wiser 3, DoctorSmile, Italy) blue laser with 450 nm wavelength for curcumin and riboflavin, and red laser with 635 nm wavelength for phycoyanin, both with 500 mW power for 30 s). The cavities were subsequently rinsed, and air-dried before restoration placement. The teeth restored by composite resine.After Thermocycling, dye penetration was assessed under a microscope. Two blinded examiners evaluated leakage, and reliability was assessed with Cohen's kappa. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney. U tests with Bonferroni correction were used. No significant difference was in cervical microleakage (P = 0.13). PDT groups showed significantly lower coronal microleakage than control (P < 0.05). aPDT using natural photosensitizers reduced coronal microleakage in Class V composite restorations in primary teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40481946What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.