SynthesisJournal of religion and health2025
Workplace Spirituality and Its Impact on Employee Well-Being: A Systematic Literature Review of Global Evidence.
Synthesis in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Workplace Spirituality in Public Administration: A Systematic Review.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Fostering food safety culture in food service organizations: the synergistic role of spirituality and safety climate.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Leader bottom-line mentality and employees' innovative work behavior: the role of workplace spirituality and value congruence.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Organizational Spirituality: Refining Its Measurement and Exploring Associations with Individual Spirituality at Work and Job Satisfaction in Poland.Journal of religion and health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Employee well-being is a critical factor influencing organizational performance, job satisfaction, and overall productivity. The role of religión in the workplace in shaping employee well-being has gained increasing scholarly attention, yet a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature remains limited. Further the lack of a comprehensive synthesis makes it difficult to assess the overall impact of religious environments on employees' psychological and professional experiences. This systematic literature review examines the impact of religious workplace environments on employee well-being from global evidence by analyzing 38 relevant studies retrieved from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The review follows the PRISMA guidelines to ensure a rigorous selection and evaluation process focusing on studies published between 2020 and 2024. The findings were divided into four themes, namely: workplace spirituality and employee well-being, spiritual leadership and organizational performance, workplace spirituality and employee engagement or motivation, and religiosity, spirituality, and employee experiences. The results indicate that a majority of the studies demonstrate a positive correlation between religious workplace practices and employee well-being metrics, reinforcing the significance of organizational spirituality. Despite these benefits, the review underscores the importance of inclusive workplace policies to ensure that religious expression does not lead to alienation or conflict. The study concludes that while religious workplaces can significantly enhance employee well-being, organizations must balance religious expressions with inclusivity to foster a supportive and harmonious work environment. Future research should explore cross-cultural comparisons and longitudinal studies to better understand the long-term implications of religious workplace settings on employee well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.