ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
The Relationship Between the Use of Speech-Generating Devices and Verbal Requests in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disabilities.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the effects of removing synthetic speech output from speech-generating devices (SGDs) and incorporating delayed reinforcement on verbal requests in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disabilities. Additionally, we examined how participants' receptive and expressive language abilities influenced vocal requests by comparing items categorized as easier or more difficult to name based on pre-assessment results.
methodsThree children with ASD and intellectual disabilities participated. An alternating treatment design was used to compare two conditions: (1) synthetic speech output with immediate reinforcement and (2) no synthetic speech output with delayed reinforcement. Preferred items were classified into two sets based on pre-assessed receptive and expressive language abilities. The dependent variable was the number of verbal and SGD-based requests.
resultsResults showed that verbal requests increased in the no synthetic speech output with delayed reinforcement condition across both item sets, while SGD-based requests remained high. Post-intervention language assessments indicated significant improvements in expressive language abilities.
conclusionThese findings suggest that removing synthetic speech output and incorporating delayed reinforcement may effectively promote vocal requests in children with ASD and intellectual disabilities. This intervention provides a novel approach to facilitate speech communication while continuing the use of AAC tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40481911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.