Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481891›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2025

Unravelling head tremor mechanisms: insights from speech analysis in essential tremor and cervical dystonia.

Jan Rusz, Petr Holly, Tereza Tykalova, Michal Simek, Tereza Hubena, Olga Ulmanova, Robert Jech, Radim Krupicka, Evzen Ruzicka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan RuszDepartment of Circuit Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, Prague, 160 00, Czechia. rusz.mz@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1036-3054
Petr HollyDepartment of Neurology, Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, Prague, 120 00, Czechia.
Tereza TykalovaDepartment of Circuit Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, Prague, 160 00, Czechia.
Michal SimekDepartment of Circuit Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, Prague, 160 00, Czechia.
Tereza HubenaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Olga UlmanovaDepartment of Neurology, Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, Prague, 120 00, Czechia.
Robert JechDepartment of Neurology, Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, Prague, 120 00, Czechia.
Radim KrupickaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Evzen RuzickaDepartment of Neurology, Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, Prague, 120 00, Czechia. eruzi@lf1.cuni.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head tremor is a common symptom in both essential tremor (ET) and cervical dystonia (CD). Distinguishing between these two conditions can be challenging in clinical practice, particularly when head tremor is the dominant feature. Our goal was to explore the potential of speech assessment in recognizing the mechanisms of head tremor in patients with ET and CD. Objective acoustic vocal assessments of oral diadochokinesis, phonatory stability, vocal tremor, and speech timing were performed. Of the 93 patients assessed, 39 had cervical dystonia (CD) with head tremor, 38 had ET with head tremor (ET-HT), and 16 had ET with no head tremor (ET-nHT). Compared to both CD and ET-nHT, ET-HT showed irregular sequential motion rate, excessive pitch fluctuations, increased noise, and higher extent of vocal vibrato. Compared to CD, ET-HT also demonstrated slower sequential motion rate, prolonged pauses, and a slower articulation rate. Additionally, ET-HT had more pronounced vocal tremolo compared to ET-nHT. Speech assessment provided discrimination between the CD and ET-HT groups with an area under curve of 0.80. This study underscores the promising potential of speech analysis in recognizing mechanisms of head tremor in patients with ET or CD, revealing more severe and distinct speech impairments in ET-HT patients compared to those with CD.

Indexed as

Essential TremorHeadSpeechTorticollisTremorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcoustic analysisCervical dystoniaDysarthriaEssential tremorSpeech disorder

Identifiers

PMID40481891
PMCPMC12479614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.