Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481873›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Simulating workload reduction with an AI-based prostate cancer detection pathway using a prediction uncertainty metric.

Stefan J Fransen, Joeran S Bosma, Quintin van Lohuizen, Christian Roest, Frank F J Simonis, Thomas C Kwee, Derya Yakar, Henkjan Huisman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefan J FransenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. s.j.fransen@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5454-5052
Joeran S BosmaRadboud University Medical Center, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Quintin van LohuizenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Christian RoestDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frank F J SimonisTechMed Centre, Technical University Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Thomas C KweeDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Derya YakarDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henkjan HuismanRadboud University Medical Center, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Health~Holland and Siemens Healthineers LSHM20103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study compared two uncertainty quantification (UQ) metrics to rule out prostate MRI scans with a high-confidence artificial intelligence (AI) prediction and investigated the resulting potential radiologist's workload reduction in a clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection pathway. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study utilized 1612 MRI scans from three institutes for csPCa (Gleason Grade Group ≥ 2) assessment. We compared the standard diagnostic pathway (radiologist reading) to an AI-based rule-out pathway in terms of efficacy and accuracy in diagnosing csPCa. In the rule-out pathway, 15 AI submodels (trained on 7756 cases) diagnosed each MRI scan, and any prediction deemed uncertain was referred to a radiologist for reading. We compared the mean (meanUQ) and variability (varUQ) of predictions using the DeLong test on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). The level of workload reduction of the best UQ method was determined based on a maintained sensitivity at non-inferior specificity using the margins 0.05 and 0.10.

resultsThe workload reduction of the proposed pathway was institute-specific: up to 20% at a 0.10 non-inferiority margin (p < 0.05) and non-significant workload reduction at a 0.05 margin. VarUQ-based rule out gave higher but non-significant AUROC scores than meanUQ in certain selected cases (+0.05 AUROC, p > 0.05).

conclusionMeanUQ and varUQ showed promise in AI-based rule-out csPCa detection. Using varUQ in an AI-based csPCa detection pathway could reduce the number of scans radiologists need to read. The varying performance of the UQ rule-out indicates the need for institute-specific UQ thresholds. KEY POINTS: Question AI can autonomously assess prostate MRI scans with high certainty at a non-inferior performance compared to radiologists, potentially reducing the workload of radiologists. Findings The optimal ratio of AI-model and radiologist readings is institute-dependent and requires calibration. Clinical relevance Semi-autonomous AI-based prostate cancer detection with variational UQ scores shows promise in reducing the number of scans radiologists need to read.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsWorkloadAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUncertaintyArtificial intelligenceComputer-assisted diagnosesMagnetic resonance imagingProstatic neoplasmsWorkload

Identifiers

PMID40481873
PMCPMC12634809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.