ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Serological analysis of gluten-related antibodies in idiopathic neuropathies and cerebellar ataxia.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Human Transglutaminases: Updated Insights into Activation Mechanisms, Allosteric Regulation and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Letter to editors regarding "Serological analysis of gluten‑related antibodies in idiopathic neuropathies and cerebellar ataxia".Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune reactivity to gluten in the development of peripheral neuropathies and cerebellar ataxia has been suggested for decades, but evidence is scarce. The aim of the current study was to test the prevalence of tissue transglutaminase 2 (anti-TG2), tissue transglutaminase 6 (anti-TG6), and gliadin antibodies (anti-gliadin) in a large cross-sectional study. The sera of patients with idiopathic cerebellar ataxia, idiopathic small fibre neuropathy (SFN) and chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP), and controls with a comparable age distribution and men/women ratio were collected. The sera were analysed for anti-gliadin IgA/IgG (manufacturer's and lower cut-off), anti-TG2 IgA and anti-TG6 IgA/IgG. In total, 683 samples were analysed: 476 patients (249 SFN, 161 CIAP and 66 idiopathic cerebellar ataxia) and 195 controls. There were no differences between disease and control group in the prevalence of elevated anti-TG6, anti-TG2 and anti-gliadin using the manufacturer's cut-off. Using a lower cut-off of 3 U/mL, previously used by others for gluten-related neurological disorders, anti-gliadin IgA was positive in 20.8% patients vs 12.8% controls (p = 0.017) and anti-gliadin IgG in 7.6% vs 2.6% (p = 0.013), respectively. In subgroup analyses, significant differences were only observed in SFN for anti-gliadin IgA and in idiopathic cerebellar ataxia for anti-gliadin IgG using this lower cut-off after adjusting for sex and age. In conclusion, no difference in anti-TG2, anti-TG6 and anti-gliadin levels were observed between patients and controls. Only when using the lower cut-off (3 U/mL), the patients with SFN and idiopathic cerebellar ataxia were more often positive for anti-gliadin than controls. Whether these low-titre antibodies are gluten related, have any pathophysiological relevance, or reflect an epiphenomenon of neurodegeneration or gut inflammation is unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.