ArticleDysphagia2025
Effects of Telemedicine on Dysphagia Rehabilitation in Patients Requiring Home Care: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-stroke dysphagia across the care continuum: a full-cycle framework for rehabilitation, supportive care, and community follow-up.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Ethical Challenges and Considerations in Dysphagia Management: A Scoping Review.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated telemedicine as an alternative to home-visit medical care (HMC) when HMC for patients with dysphagia was suspended. This retrospective study assessed whether telemedicine reduced adverse events compared to suspending care during the initial 3 months of the coronavirus pandemic. Seventy-six HMC patients were enrolled. Those who received telemedicine formed the telemedicine group (TG), and those who declined comprised the suspended group (SG). Baseline data and adverse events, including whole-body and dysphagia-related adverse events, were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, and binomial logistic regression. Of the 76 patients, 20 were in TG and 56 in SG. Telemedicine consultations' frequency was 1-3. Significant baseline differences occurred in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and caregiver type. In the TG and SG, 0% and 12.5% of patients experienced whole-body adverse events and 10.0% and 33.9% had dysphagia-related adverse events, respectively. Dysphagia-related adverse events were significantly lower in TG (p = 0.046). Telemedicine was significantly associated with fewer dysphagia-related adverse events after adjusting for age, CCI, and Dysphagia Severity Scale (p = 0.040). Telemedicine effectively supplemented in-person dysphagia rehabilitation, enabling continued monitoring and reducing complications, although patient self-selection and caregiver support may have influenced outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.