ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025
Described neural connections enhance classroom learning of neuroanatomy.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Described neural connections enhance classroom learning of neuroanatomy.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in brain imaging have led to a paradigm shift in neuroscience research, moving from focusing on individual brain structures to investigating neural networks and connections. However, neuroanatomy education still tends to concentrate on discrete brain regions. Two separate experiments in undergraduate neuroscience courses investigated whether incorporating neural connectivity into neuroanatomy education would enhance learning. Students in each experiment learned to identify brain structures through computer-based training sessions that provided text-based narrative feedback about neural connections, followed by final memory tests after a 1-month delay. The first experiment included 30 students and demonstrated a long-term memory benefit associated with described neural connections, showing a medium effect size (p = 0.01, d = 0.54) comparable to the established retrieval practice effect for enhancing long-term memory (p = 0.03, d = 0.47). The second experiment replicated the benefits of described neural connections with a small effect size (p = 0.005, d = 0.28) in a larger sample of 122 students across classrooms at two universities. Furthermore, students remembered the functional outcomes of neural connections from training (p < 0.001, d = 0.46), and this generalized to clinical applications (p = 0.009, d = 0.27). In contrast, categorizing brain areas without describing neural connections (as is commonly done in introductory neuroscience textbook chapters) did not benefit either memory or generalization. Findings demonstrate that leveraging the connectivity paradigm shift in neuroscience research can enhance neuroanatomy education. Emphasizing neural connections and their functional outcomes helps simplify neuroanatomy and improve understanding and retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.