ArticleQualitative health research2026
Query-Based Analysis: A Strategy for Analyzing Qualitative Data Using ChatGPT.
Article in Qualitative health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Methods in Health Research: Rapid Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- Recovery in Mental Health: A Synthesis of the Perspectives of Experts by Experience, Recovery-Oriented Professionals and Family Caregivers in Relation to the CHIME and SPICE Frameworks.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- The Use and Perceptions of AI Chatbots in Medical Research: An International Cross-Sectional Survey.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ChatGPT is a recently introduced artificial intelligence program that is gaining broad popularity across a number of fields, one of which is the analysis of qualitative data in health-related research. Traditionally, many forms of qualitative data have relied on a detailed process of coding the data by labeling small segments of the data, and then aggregating those codes into more meaningful themes. Instead, generative artificial intelligence programs such as ChatGPT can reverse this process by developing themes at the beginning of the analysis process and then refining them further. This article presents a specific three-step process, query-based analysis, for using ChatGPT in qualitative data analysis. The first step is to ask broad, unstructured queries; the second is to follow up with more specific queries; and the third is to examine the supporting data. A demonstration of this process applies query-based analysis of an empirical dataset that consists of six focus groups with caregivers for a family member experiencing cognitive impairment, who discussed their experiences in seeking diagnosis for their family member. The conclusions consider the potential impacts of query-based analysis on traditional approaches based on the coding of qualitative data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.