Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481623›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2026

Query-Based Analysis: A Strategy for Analyzing Qualitative Data Using ChatGPT.

David L Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David L MorganDepartment of Sociology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6014-7643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ChatGPT is a recently introduced artificial intelligence program that is gaining broad popularity across a number of fields, one of which is the analysis of qualitative data in health-related research. Traditionally, many forms of qualitative data have relied on a detailed process of coding the data by labeling small segments of the data, and then aggregating those codes into more meaningful themes. Instead, generative artificial intelligence programs such as ChatGPT can reverse this process by developing themes at the beginning of the analysis process and then refining them further. This article presents a specific three-step process, query-based analysis, for using ChatGPT in qualitative data analysis. The first step is to ask broad, unstructured queries; the second is to follow up with more specific queries; and the third is to examine the supporting data. A demonstration of this process applies query-based analysis of an empirical dataset that consists of six focus groups with caregivers for a family member experiencing cognitive impairment, who discussed their experiences in seeking diagnosis for their family member. The conclusions consider the potential impacts of query-based analysis on traditional approaches based on the coding of qualitative data.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceQualitative ResearchCaregiversFocus GroupsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansartificial intelligenceChatGPTcodingqualitative data analysis

Identifiers

PMID40481623
PMCPMC12949036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.