Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481618›Full record

ReviewAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026

An overview of the postcranial osteology of caecilians (Gymnophiona, Lissamphibia).

Rodolfo Otávio Santos, Mark Wilkinson, Hussam Zaher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rodolfo Otávio SantosInstituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8264-5803
Mark WilkinsonHerpetology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Hussam ZaherServiço de Vertebrados, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.596134/2020-00Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.716747/2022-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2002/13602-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2011/50146-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caecilians comprise a relatively small (~220 species) group (Gymnophiona) of snake-like or worm-like, mostly tropical amphibians. Most adult caecilians are fossorial, although some species may live in aquatic or semi-aquatic environments, either as larvae or adults. Caecilians exhibit numerous morphological features traditionally interpreted as adaptations to their specialized ecologies, such as a compact and well-ossified skull and an elongated body lacking both girdles and limbs. Caecilian vertebrae differ substantially from those of other amphibians in having amphicoelous centra, well-developed basapophyseal processes, pronounced posterosagittal processes and hypapophyseal keels, and low and flat neural arches. However, caecilian postcranial osteology has received little attention, and the vast majority of the species remain unstudied. Consequently, the variation in the vertebral morphology among caecilians is still unknown or poorly documented. Inconsistencies in the anatomical terminology used by different authors are potentially confusing and may hamper understanding of homologies. Here we present an overview of caecilian postcranial osteology, define the main structural features, including many not previously described, and propose a standardized nomenclature.

Indexed as

AmphibiansSkullSpineAnimalsBiological EvolutionOsteologyaxial skeletoncomparative anatomyherpetologyvertebral column

Identifiers

PMID40481618
PMCPMC12882041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.