ArticleGenome medicine2025
PhenoDP: leveraging deep learning for phenotype-based case reporting, disease ranking, and symptom recommendation.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning approaches for resolving genomic discrepancies in cancer: a systematic review and clinical perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- A Multimodal Biomedical Transformer Fusion Network for Disease-Level Rare-Disease-Inheritance Classification Using Ontology-Enriched Text, Metadata, and Gene Associations.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent phenotype-based diagnostic tools often struggle with accurate disease prioritization due to incomplete phenotypic data and the complexity of rare disease presentations. Additionally, they lack the ability to generate patient-centered clinical insights or recommend further symptoms for differential diagnosis.
methodsWe developed PhenoDP, a deep learning-based toolkit with three modules: Summarizer, Ranker, and Recommender. The Summarizer fine-tuned a distilled large language model to create clinical summaries from a patient's Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms. The Ranker prioritizes diseases by combining information content-based, phi-based, and semantic-based similarity measures. The Recommender employs contrastive learning to recommend additional HPO terms for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.
resultsPhenoDP's Summarizer produces more clinically coherent and patient-centered summaries than the general-purpose language model FlanT5. The Ranker achieves state-of-the-art diagnostic performance, consistently outperforming existing phenotype-based methods across both simulated and real-world datasets. The Recommender also outperformed GPT-4o and PhenoTips in improving diagnostic accuracy when its suggested terms were incorporated into different ranking pipelines.
conclusionsPhenoDP enhances Mendelian disease diagnosis through deep learning, offering precise summarization, ranking, and symptom recommendation. Its superior performance and open-source design make it a valuable clinical tool, with potential to accelerate diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. PhenoDP is freely available at https://github.com/TianLab-Bioinfo/PhenoDP .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.