ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
Outcome and process evaluation of a social norms approach intervention on nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for study performance among Flemish university students: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudents are increasingly engaging in the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) to enhance their study performance. However, little research has been conducted on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce NMUPS. This study assessed the effect of a social norms approach (SNA) intervention on NMUPS and the perception of NMUPS for study performance among Flemish students. Additionally, a process evaluation of the intervention was performed.
methodsA social media campaign, containing social norm messages based on data from 'Head in the Clouds?' (HITC) survey edition 2021, ran from December 2022 to April 2023 at the University of Antwerp. Data from the HITC survey was also used as baseline measurement (Antwerp: n = 2,963, Ghent: n = 8,598). Afterward, a post-intervention survey was conducted among the students of the University of Antwerp (n = 1,827) and Ghent University (n = 3,333), the latter serving as the control group. A quantitative process evaluation among the intervention group was conducted according to the guidance of the Medical Research Council for process evaluation of complex interventions.
resultsA difference-in-difference approach showed that students of the intervention group at endline estimated NMUPS for study performance among peers significantly lower (P < .0001; Est. = -3.792; SE = 0.805)-and thus closer to the real social norm. There was no significant influence (P = 0.421; OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.87 to -1.39) of the intervention on NMUPS for study performance. The process analysis showed that 18.7% of the intervention group had seen the campaign. Most of them found the campaign credible (83.6%) and clear (website: 90.8%; videos 94.7%; images: 92.4%). The overall satisfaction was 6.38 (SD 1.68) out of 10. Very few students (3.1%) had seen the campaign via TikTok, compared to Facebook (64.0%) and Instagram (53.3%), although 35.7% of the total budget had been spent on TikTok.
conclusionsThe results of this study confirm that an SNA intervention could reduce the misperceptions of NMUPS among students. However, the hypothesis that the behavior of NMUPS for study performance would be reduced subsequently could not be demonstrated. Follow-up research is needed to investigate long-term effects. The implementation of the intervention might be improved by making more optimal use of the campaign budget.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.