ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2025
The use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to central venous catheterization in infants: a national survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dermatological Safety of Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Dressings in Paediatric Intensive Care: A Randomised Clinical Trial.Nursing in critical care · 2026Trial
- Management of umbilical venous and arterial catheter: Neonatal European Vascular Access Team- ESPR Recommendation 2.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Vascular access in the newborn: a position paper of Neonatal European Vascular Access Teams (NEVAT).European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background2% Chlorhexidine gluconate in a 70% alcohol solution is considered the gold standard for skin disinfection in adult and paediatric patients prior to insertion of a central venous catheter. The use of chlorhexidine gluconate in infants remains controversial due to concerns about potential risks of skin injury such as chemical burns, contact dermatitis and systemic absorption. The objective of this survey is to investigate the practice of skin disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol prior to central venous catheterization in infants in Italy.
methodsOver a one-year period, we conducted an online survey in 114 neonatal intensive care units on the use of skin antiseptics for central venous catheters in neonates.
resultsSixty-five percent of the centers use a 2% chlorhexidine solution in a 70% alcohol solution for skin disinfection before inserting central catheters in neonates. Ten percent use povidone-iodine, and two percent use sodium hypochlorite. Among those using alcoholic chlorhexidine, sixty-five percent use it without any restrictions, thirty percent limit its use based on the gestational age of the neonate, and five percent limit it based on the neonatal weight. Thirty-seven percent of the centers rinse off the chlorhexidine solution due to concerns about chemical injuries.
conclusionsThe survey revealed that there's still a lack of uniformity in the use of skin disinfectants before central catheter placement. The Neonatal Vascular Access Group (AVN GdS) of the Italian Society of Neonatology reiterates the use of 2% chlorhexidine in a 70% alcohol solution for skin disinfection before central catheter insertion, as recommended by recent guidelines. However, specific precautions must be taken to avoid complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.