Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481592›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2025

The use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to central venous catheterization in infants: a national survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology.

Vito D'Andrea, Antonella Capasso, Carmen Rodriguez-Perez, Francesca Tota, Rossella Mastroianni, Giorgia Prontera, Giovanni Barone

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vito D'AndreaNeonatology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli N 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Antonella CapassoNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, A.O.U. Federico 2, Naples, Italy.
Carmen Rodriguez-PerezNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Ospedale Dei Bambini, Brescia, Italy.
Francesca TotaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale S. Chiara, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Rossella MastroianniNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Anna E S. Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy.
Giorgia PronteraNeonatology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli N 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. giorgia.prontera@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-1726
Giovanni BaroneNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background2% Chlorhexidine gluconate in a 70% alcohol solution is considered the gold standard for skin disinfection in adult and paediatric patients prior to insertion of a central venous catheter. The use of chlorhexidine gluconate in infants remains controversial due to concerns about potential risks of skin injury such as chemical burns, contact dermatitis and systemic absorption. The objective of this survey is to investigate the practice of skin disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol prior to central venous catheterization in infants in Italy.

methodsOver a one-year period, we conducted an online survey in 114 neonatal intensive care units on the use of skin antiseptics for central venous catheters in neonates.

resultsSixty-five percent of the centers use a 2% chlorhexidine solution in a 70% alcohol solution for skin disinfection before inserting central catheters in neonates. Ten percent use povidone-iodine, and two percent use sodium hypochlorite. Among those using alcoholic chlorhexidine, sixty-five percent use it without any restrictions, thirty percent limit its use based on the gestational age of the neonate, and five percent limit it based on the neonatal weight. Thirty-seven percent of the centers rinse off the chlorhexidine solution due to concerns about chemical injuries.

conclusionsThe survey revealed that there's still a lack of uniformity in the use of skin disinfectants before central catheter placement. The Neonatal Vascular Access Group (AVN GdS) of the Italian Society of Neonatology reiterates the use of 2% chlorhexidine in a 70% alcohol solution for skin disinfection before central catheter insertion, as recommended by recent guidelines. However, specific precautions must be taken to avoid complications.

Indexed as

2-PropanolAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCatheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsChlorhexidineDisinfectionSkinFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalItalyMaleSurveys and Questionnaires2-PropanolAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateCentral line bloodstream infectionsChlorhexidine gluconatePremature infantsSkin disinfection

Identifiers

PMID40481592
PMCPMC12144814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.