SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025
Drug treatment options of high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer based on efficacy and safety: a systematic review and Bayesian network analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmerging evidence has revealed the potential efficacy of Novel Hormonal Agent (NHA) or chemotherapy in high-risk patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR). However, the optimal drug-based treatment strategy remains unknown.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases up to February 18, 2024 to identify relevant studies. Our analysis focused on outcome measures, including prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), overall survival (OS) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was utilized to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of various treatment modalities.
resultsFour randomized controlled trials with 2074 participants were selected for data extraction and analysis. Treatment combining Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) with Enzalutamide (ENZA) significantly enhanced PSA-PFS as compared to ADT monotherapy (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.07, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.01-0.97). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated ADT + ENZA as the most effective strategy for improving PSA-PFS. In terms of OS improvement, the treatments were ranked as follows: ADT + Docetaxel (DOC), ADT + ENZA, ENZA, and ADT. In terms of adverse event incidence, ADT exhibited the lowest incidence of adverse events, followed by ADT + ENZA. In the meta-analysis, ADT + NHA combined therapy achieved superior efficacy in PSA-PFS and OS than ADT.
conclusionThis study suggests that ADT + NHA, particularly ADT + ENZA, may provide a significant survival benefit and an acceptable safety profile for prostate cancer patients at high-risk BCR. The findings could potentially inform the selection of medications for these patients, although further confirmation through large-scale clinical trials is imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.