ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Breastfeeding experiences and infant feeding decisions for women birthing Aboriginal children in Adelaide, South Australia: a qualitative study.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urgent investment needed to reclaim lactation care and training to support Indigenous women, babies, families, and communities.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Defining Low Milk Supply: A Data-Driven Diagnostic Framework and Risk Factor Analysis for Breastfeeding Women.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing breastfeeding rates among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter, respectfully Aboriginal) infants could improve health outcomes that disproportionately affect Aboriginal children into adulthood. This study was undertaken with mothers birthing Aboriginal children in Adelaide, Australia. The study sought to: understand their perceptions, motivations, influences and experiences around breastfeeding; explore factors affecting the ability to breastfeed; perceptions of alternative feeding options; and experiences of care to support breastfeeding.
methodsSemi-structured Research Yarning interviews were conducted between November 2020 and May 2022 with 30 mothers who birthed an Aboriginal baby within metropolitan Adelaide, Australia, within the previous 18 months. Women were invited to participate if they were enrolled in a larger cohort study known as the Aboriginal Families and Baby Bundles Study, or had antenatal care from the local Aboriginal community controlled health service, were aged 16 and over, and were involved in feeding the child since birth. Three female Aboriginal researchers undertook the Yarning interviews, which were transcribed and analysed thematically.
resultsParticipants demonstrated a strong desire to breastfeed and described a range of factors impacting on their ability to establish or maintain breastfeeding. The role of healthcare providers was key to breastfeeding success with participants reporting both positive and negative care experiences. Participants described supportive experiences as those where non-judgemental care was provided that was tailored to their needs, included Aboriginal staff, and provision of continuity of care. Mothers described negative effects of their experiences of racism and ageism (young mothers) from care providers.
conclusionsAboriginal women expressed a range of challenges to sustaining breastfeeding that could be addressed by increased investment in provision of timely, non-judgemental postnatal care tailored to their social and cultural needs, including access to specialised lactation care in the hospital and including facilitated continuation of successful breastfeeding at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.