Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481508›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025

The effect of training data size on real-time respiration prediction using long short-term memory model.

Wenzheng Sun, Jun Dang, Lei Zhang, Qichun Wei, Chao Li, Ye Liu, Huang Jing, Kanghua Huang, Yuanpeng Zhang, Bing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenzheng Sun *Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China.
Jun Dang *Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518116, China.
Lei ZhangGraduate Program of Medical Physics and Jiangsu Provincial University Key Laboratory for Smart Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, 215316, China.
Qichun WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China.
Chao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China.
Ye LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China.
Huang JingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China.
Kanghua HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China.
Yuanpeng ZhangDepartment of Medical Informatics, Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Bing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China. zlyylibing4127@zzu.edu.cn.

Funding

Clinical Operating Fund of High-level Hospitals of the Central Government and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Hospital Cooperation Fund CFA202502022Duke Kunshan University Education Development Foundation 22KDKUF032Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation under Grant 2023A1515011365Henan provincial Medical Science and Technology Research Project SBGJ202103038National Natural Science Foundation of China 62103366Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China 222300420575Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20220530153801003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the optimal training dataset size (TDS) for respiration prediction accuracy using a long short-term memory (LSTM) model.

methodsThe respiratory signals of 151 patients acquired with the real-time position management system were retrospectively included in this study. Among the dataset, 101 respiratory signals were utilized to evaluate the impact of the TDS on prediction accuracy, while the remaining 50 signals were employed for setting the default hyperparameters. The prediction accuracy of the LSTM model using eight different TDSs (10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s, 90 s, 110 s, 130 s, and 150 s) was examined and evaluated by the root mean square error (RMSE) between the real and predicted respiratory signals. The interplay effects of the main hyperparameters, the ahead time and the different testing data lengths using different TDSs were also measured.

resultsFor the 520 ms ahead time, the root mean square error values of the LSTM model using the eight different training data sizes listed above were 0.146 cm, 0.137 cm, 0.134 cm, 0.125 cm, 0.120 cm, 0.121 cm, 0.121 cm, and 0.119 cm, respectively. The LSTM model achieved the highest prediction accuracy when the TDS was 150 s. The prediction accuracy was stable when the TDS exceeded 90 s.

conclusionsTDS selection could influence the respiration signal prediction accuracy of the LSTM model. The relationship between TDS and the prediction accuracy of the LSTM model was not linear. The 90 s seemed to be an optimal TDS for the respiration signal prediction tasks using the LSTM model, as it was the shortest time at which a favorable prediction accuracy was maintained in this study.

Indexed as

RespirationAlgorithmsFemaleHumansLong Short Term MemoryMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesLong short-term memory modelRadiation therapyRespiration predictionRespiratory motion managementTraining dataset size

Identifiers

PMID40481508
PMCPMC12144701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.