Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481498›Full record

Observational studyReproductive health2025

Reaching caesarean section rates below 15%: experience of a French tertiary maternity using the Robson classification system.

Julien Echalard, Manon Vouga, Aude Bourtembourg-Matras, Didier Riethmuller, Nicolas Mottet

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julien EchalardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Pôle Mère-Femme, Alexander Fleming Boulevard, Besançon, 25000, France. Julien.echalard@gmail.com.
Manon VougaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Pôle Mère-Femme, Alexander Fleming Boulevard, Besançon, 25000, France.
Aude Bourtembourg-MatrasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Pôle Mère-Femme, Alexander Fleming Boulevard, Besançon, 25000, France.
Didier RiethmullerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Pôle Mère-Femme, Alexander Fleming Boulevard, Besançon, 25000, France.
Nicolas MottetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Pôle Mère-Femme, Alexander Fleming Boulevard, Besançon, 25000, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaesarean sections (CS) rates are constantly increasing. Despite being a life-saving procedure, this uncontrolled rise remains questionable. While international data suggest that increasing CS rates up to 10–15%, at the population level, is associated with a reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality, the benefit of higher CS rates remains debated.

methodsThe aim of this study was to describe trends of delivery by CS, using the Robson classification and to assess maternal and perinatal outcomes accordingly to identify potential strategies to control the rise in CS rates. This retrospective observational study included all births ≥ 22 weeks of gestation that occurred in a tertiary university hospital in Besançon, France, from January 1st, 2017, to December 31st, 2023. All deliveries were classified using Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS). Relative size, CS rate and contribution to the overall CS rate were described for each group. Secondary outcomes were rates of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.

resultsA total of 19 082 women were included. The 7-year mean CS rate was 14.4% (n = 2753). A significant reduction of the overall CS rate from 15.4 to 13.0% (95% CI 0.5–4.2%) was observed between 2020 and 2023. This reduction was related to a significant reduction in overall CS rate among group 5 and an important trend towards reduction in group 6. The cesarean rate in group 1 remained stable over the period at 8% on average. During the study period, an increase in induction rates was observed. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were stable. A significant reduction of neonatal transfer was observed between 2020 and 2023 (1.4%; 95%CI 0.5-2.3%).

conclusionsAn average CS rate below 15% was achieved without increasing maternal and neonatal complications in a tertiary university hospital. Potential target interventions include a better management of women with a previous CS and breech deliveries.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionAdultFemaleFranceHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersCaesarean sectionInduction of laborMaternal and neonatal outcomesRobson classificationTen-Group Classification System

Identifiers

PMID40481498
PMCPMC12144707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.