ArticleBMC public health2025
A cross-sectional study on household disaster preparedness in China and analysis of its influencing factors.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn disaster response, household disaster preparedness is pivotal to risk avoidance, self-rescue, and mutual aid capabilities. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the status and determinants of household disaster preparedness among Chinese residents.
methodsThe study was conducted through cluster sampling of residents across 22 provinces, 4 municipalities, and 5 autonomous regions in China. Statistical analysis and model construction were conducted on data collected from 9,966 respondents.
resultsThe findings revealed widespread inadequacies in the preparation of multiple types of household emergency supplies. Significant disparities in emergency supplies stockpiling were observed across groups stratified by gender, residence type, monthly household income per capita, educational attainment and employment status. Additionally, there were also certain differences between different regions. Further analysis through a sequential mediation model revealed that household disaster preparedness was closely associated with family members' personality traits, self-efficacy and perceived social support. Within the Big Five personality framework, extraversion, conscientiousness and openness significantly promoted household preparedness behaviors, whereas neuroticism negative correlation with preparedness levels. Self-efficacy and perceived social support were significant mediating factors in household disaster preparedness among residents with distinct personality traits, exhibiting varied mechanisms of influence.
conclusionsThis study provides scientific evidence and directional guidance for formulating comprehensive strategies to enhance household disaster preparedness levels among Chinese residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.