ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Dynamic profiles of early biological responses to predict the treatment efficacy of proton therapy in liver cancer assessed with in vivo kinetic [18F]-FDG PET/MRI.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProton beam therapy is an advanced treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, evaluating the response to treatment with tumor size alone is insufficient. Herein, we used kinetic [18F]-FDG PET and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to monitor the biological responses to proton beam therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma mice to assess treatment efficacy. Murine BNL HCC cells were orthotopically implanted into the livers of 8-week-old male BALB/c mice, which received 20 Gy of the single dose in proton beam therapy. The biological responses to proton beam therapy were assessed on pre-treatment and post-treatment days 1, 3, and 7.
resultsCompared with the not-receiving proton beam therapy group, the treated group led to an increasing trend in tumor K1 values and constant relative SUVs within 7 days on the dynamic PET imaging. On diffusion-weighted MR imaging, the tumor relative apparent diffusion coefficient values significantly increased post-treatment days 3 and 7. Significantly decreased tumor proliferation, cellular density, and cellular uptake of [18F]-FDG on days 1 and/or 3 post-treatment, with a rebound on day 7, were observed in the dynamic profiling of tumor cells ex vivo and in vitro. Vascular remodeling and elevated macrophage infiltrates in the tumor microenvironment were associated with proton beam therapy. However, there were no significant changes in tumor size between the treated and non-treated groups after treatment until day 7.
conclusionsIn vivo kinetic [18F]-FDG PET/MRI techniques can provide a feasible means to assess early liver tumor response to proton beam therapy and predict treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.