Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481459›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Gender gap in tooth brushing among Korean adolescents.

Ichiro Kawachi, Jae-In Ryu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ichiro KawachiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jae-In RyuDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. jaeinryu@khu.ac.kr.

Funding

Kyung Hee University 20242052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have reported a gender gap in toothbrushing habits. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of tooth brushing after lunch among South Korean schoolboys (29.2%) was approximately half of that among girls (48.5%). During the pandemic, the rate of tooth brushing decreased in both boys and girls. However, the gender gap in toothbrushing decreased by 5.6%, owing to a larger decline in girls. This study aimed to understand the gender gap in toothbrushing before and during the pandemic. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on analyses of data obtained from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey from 2017 to 2022, the nationally representative sample (n = 341,265) comprised middle and high school students. Chi-square tests and weighted probit regressions were performed to evaluate differences in the prevalence of tooth brushing after lunch according to socioeconomic factors, health-related behaviors, and mental health conditions. All analyses were performed using Stata (version 18.0, Stata Corp, College Station, Texas, USA), and statistical significance was set to α = 0.05.

resultsThe gender gap cannot be explained by differences in hygiene practices (e.g., handwashing), health behaviors (smoking), parental education, family socioeconomic circumstances, depressive symptoms, or stress. One reason for the decline may be the policy of mandatory mask-wearing in Korean schools during the pandemic.

conclusionsIf girls were more motivated than boys to brush their teeth for cosmetic reasons (clean appearance of teeth or fresh breath), this may account for the larger decrease in tooth brushing among girls during the mandatory mask-wearing policy.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCOVID-19ToothbrushingAdolescentFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleRepublic of KoreaSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentCovid-19Gender roleSadnessToothbrushing

Identifiers

PMID40481459
PMCPMC12144724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.