Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481455›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

AI for mental health: clinician expectations and priorities in computational psychiatry.

Leo Fischer, Paula Antonia Mann, Minh-Hieu H Nguyen, Stefan Becker, Shiva Khodadadi, Antonia Schulz, Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah, Jonathan Repple, Tim Hahn, Andreas Reif and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial Intelligence Tools in Psychiatric Education: Innovating While Maintaining Human Connection.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Leo FischerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Paula Antonia MannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Minh-Hieu H NguyenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Stefan BeckerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Shiva KhodadadiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Antonia SchulzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sharmili Edwin ThanarajahDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jonathan ReppleDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Tim HahnInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Andreas ReifDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Amir SalamikhanshanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sarah Kittel-SchneiderDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioural Science, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Winfried RiefDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Christoph MulertCentre of Psychiatry, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Stefan G HofmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Udo DannlowskiInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Tilo KircherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Felix P BernhardDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Hamidreza JamalabadiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. hamidreza.jamalabadi@uni-marburg.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 521379614University Hospital of Gießen and Marburg (UKGM) 1/2024 MR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental disorders represent a major global health challenge, with an estimated lifetime prevalence approaching 30%. Despite the availability of effective treatments, access to mental health care remains inadequate. Computational psychiatry, leveraging advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), has shown potential for transforming mental health care by improving diagnosis, prognosis, and the personalization of treatment. However, integrating these technologies into routine clinical practice remains limited due to technical and infrastructure challenges. While ongoing computational developments will enhance AI's precision, many studies focus on its broad potential without providing specific, clinician-informed guidance for immediate application. To address this gap and the urgent need for clinically actionable AI tools, we surveyed 53 psychiatrists and clinical psychologists to identify their priorities for AI in mental health care. Our findings reveal a strong preference for tools enabling continuous monitoring and predictive modeling, particularly in outpatient settings. Clinicians prioritize accurate predictions of symptom trajectories and proactive patient monitoring over interpretability and explicit treatment recommendations. Self-reports, third-party observations, and sleep quality and duration emerged as key data inputs for effective models. Together, this study provides a clinician-driven roadmap for AI integration, emphasizing predictive models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to forecast disorder trajectories and support real-world practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitude of Health PersonnelMental DisordersPsychiatryFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleAIClinician expectationsComputational psychiatryEcological momentary assessment (EMA)

Identifiers

PMID40481455
PMCPMC12143059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.