ArticleBMC public health2025
Community partnership lessons learned from the You & Me: Test and Treat study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05589376 (You and Me Healthy Registry Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
You and Me Healthy Registry Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The roadmap for community engagement: co-design and evaluation of a toolkit to strengthen community-academic research partnerships.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A qualitative evaluation of a partnership between a local authority and community organisations to improve mental health and wellbeing.Discover public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-engaged research relies on the strength of partnerships to achieve and sustain shared goals. The You & Me: Test and Treat (YMTT) project aimed to promote COVID-19 test and treatment access using a tiered model of community engagement and a codeveloped toolkit to foster robust community-academic partnerships. This study assesses the YMTT project's strengths, identifies partnership lessons learned, and evaluates the toolkit's utility.
methodsThis analysis of the YMTT project was conducted from May 2024 to October 2024. A mixed-methods approach was used. Participants represented anchor, local community, and academic partners from YMTT. A validated survey assessed partnership dynamics, including communication, collaboration, and dissemination. The Community Engagement Toolkit Survey and focus groups explored the YMTT partnership strengths and toolkit's utility, while a collaborative exercise documented reflections on partnership processes. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
resultsTwenty-two participants (4 anchor partners, 10 community partners, and 8 academic partners) completed surveys, focus groups, and collaborative exercises. Survey results highlighted strong communication practices (88% agreement on effective, ongoing communication) and mutual respect (88% agreement on valued contributions). Key challenges and themes from the collaborative exercise included trust building, sustainability planning, equitable resource sharing, and accessibility of tools for diverse community partners.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that strong communication and mutual respect underpin effective partnerships but highlighted the need for improved sustainability planning and accessible tools. These findings provide a roadmap for enhancing community-academic partnerships and addressing health disparities through equitable, sustainable collaboration.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05589376. Registered 21 October 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.