ArticleBMC oral health2025
Utilization of magnification devices in Vietnam's dental practice and education: an online survey.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvancements in dental technology have enhanced diagnostic and treatment tools, with magnification devices improving clinical precision and ergonomics. Dental loupes, conventional dental operating microscopes (DOMs), and three-dimensional digital operating microscopes (3D-DOMs) help overcome visual limitations in intricate procedures. Although widely used globally, adoption in Vietnam remains underreported. This study aimed to assess magnification device utilization in Vietnamese dental practice and education, with a pioneering focus on 3D-DOMs.
methodsAn online, questionnaire-based observational survey was conducted from October to December 2024. A total of 108 dentists responded, along with 11 dental education institutions and 5 hospitals (2 specialized, 3 general). The 28-item questionnaire, validated by a subject expert (CVI-S = 0.9), was distributed via email and messaging platforms. Google login ensured one response per participant. Data were analyzed using JASP (version 0.19.3) with descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests (p < 0.05).
resultsAwareness was high (96.4%), while actual usage was moderate (62.96%). Usage varied by setting: specialized hospitals (100%) and education institutions (80%) showed higher adoption than general hospitals (33.33%). Dental loupes were most common (55.56%), followed by DOMs (25.93%) and 3D-DOMs (5.56%). Future usage intentions were high, particularly for loupes (81.48%). Endodontics was perceived as the specialty benefiting most. Despite cost being the primary barrier, satisfaction was high. Formal training significantly improved self-rated knowledge and satisfaction.
conclusionsDespite cost and ergonomic barriers, magnification devices—especially 3D-DOMs—show strong potential. With improved training and resource allocation, they could significantly enhance diagnostic precision and clinical outcomes in Vietnamese dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.