Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481430›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Attempted suicide short intervention program for older adults 65+ (ASSIP-OA): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Sara Hed, Anne Ingeborg Berg, Maria Tillfors, Anna Ehnvall, Åsa Westrin, Stefan Wiktorsson, Anja Gysin-Maillart, Margda Waern

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06831942 (Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program for Older Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06831942 narecruitingnot on this map

Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program for Older Adults (ASSIP-OA): An RCT and a Qualitative Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention for Suicidal Adults Aged 65+

TypeinterventionalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2025 to 2031Enrolled132ConditionsSuicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempt, SuicideArmsASSIP-OA, Treatment as Usual (TAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara HedDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Blå Stråket 15, SU/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden. sara.hed@gu.se.
Anne Ingeborg BergDepartment of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Maria TillforsDepartment of Social and Psychological Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Anna EhnvallDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Blå Stråket 15, SU/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden.
Åsa WestrinDepartment of Psychiatry, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Stefan WiktorssonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Blå Stråket 15, SU/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden.
Anja Gysin-MaillartUnit for Clinical Suicide Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Psychiatry, Sweden.
Margda WaernDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Blå Stråket 15, SU/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults are underrepresented in suicide prevention research, even though suicide rates are higher in this age group (65+) than in any other age group in many countries worldwide. There are few clinical intervention studies that target this age group. A promising preventive intervention is the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP). Given differences in suicidal behaviour between older and younger adults, there is a need for suicide prevention intervention models that are adaptable to the heterogenic needs of older adults. This study protocol outlines the design of our upcoming study, which aims to evaluate a modified version of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) specifically adapted for older adults (65+), ASSIP for Older Adults (ASSIP-OA), as add-on to Treatment as Usual (TAU) and compared to TAU only.

methodsA multicentre two-group parallel randomised controlled trial will be conducted to compare TAU to ASSIP-OA (3–5 sessions) and standardized letters for 2 years as an add-on to treatment as usual. The trial, which is open labelled, will recruit 132 participants (65+) within psychiatric services in Sweden after a suicide attempt or hospitalisation for serious suicidal plans. The main modifications in comparison with the original ASSIP include (a) flexibility in treatment delivery (offering home visits, breaks and shorter/longer sessions as needed), (b) an additional session together with relatives or other support person(s), and (c) age-specific linguistic and content-wise adaptation of homework, letters, and case conceptualization. The primary outcome is a suicidal episode (fatal or non-fatal). Secondary outcomes include psychiatric symptoms, severity of suicidal ideation, coping style and quality of life. The trial also includes measures of feasibility, health-care utilization and negative effects of treatment. DISCUSSION: This study has the potential to inform the development and implementation of a more person-centred care for suicidal older adults.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06831942. Registered February 21, 2025, revised May 21, 2025.

Indexed as

Psychotherapy, BriefSuicide, AttemptedSuicide PreventionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSwedenAttempted suicide short intervention programMulticentre randomised controlled trialOlder adultsSuicide attemptSuicide preventions

Identifiers

PMID40481430
PMCPMC12142994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.