ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
DAGSLAM: causal Bayesian network structure learning of mixed type data and its application in identifying disease risk factors.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance Evaluation of Bayesian Network Learning Algorithms in Structural Equation Modeling: A Simulation Study.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From association to causation: a decision-aware framework for reproducible biomarker discovery and precision intervention design in the human gut microbiome.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Advanced analysis of formulation parameters governing encapsulation efficiency: drug delivery system.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying and understanding disease risk factors is crucial in epidemiology, particularly for chronic and noncommunicable diseases that often have complex interrelationships. Traditional statistical methods struggle to capture these complexities, necessitating more sophisticated analytical frameworks. Bayesian networks and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) provide powerful tools for exploring the complex relationships between variables. However, existing DAG structure learning algorithms still have limitations in handling mixed-type data (including continuous and discrete variables), which restricts their practical utility. Therefore, developing DAG structure learning methods that can effectively handle mixed data is highly important for obtaining an in-depth understanding of disease risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms.
methodsThis study proposes an extension of the NOTEARS algorithm, termed DAGSLAM, which is designed for Bayesian network structure learning with mixed-type data. The algorithm integrates continuous and categorical variables through a tailored loss function, enhancing its applicability to real-world epidemiological datasets.
resultsExtensive simulations were conducted across eight distinct scenarios, specifically, variations in the number of nodes, changes in the proportion of categorical nodes, different sample sizes, levels of categorical nodes, variations in edge sparsity, adjustments to the weight scale, different graph types, and diverse noise distributions. These scenarios demonstrate that DAGSLAM consistently outperforms existing methods such as HC, TABU, mDAG, and DAGBagM across key metrics, including precision, recall, F1 score, and structural Hamming distance (SHD). Furthermore, the robustness of DAGSLAM is validated through its application to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset, revealing critical causal relationships among risk factors for CHD and diabetes.
conclusionsDAGSLAM provides a powerful and scalable tool for uncovering causal relationships in complex disease networks, with significant implications for risk factor identification and public health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.