ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Understanding lightbulb moments: Meaning-making in visual morphology from comics and emoji.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How do we interpret a lightbulb above a head in visual images to mean inspiration? We investigated the semantic processing of these "upfixes" like lightbulbs or gears that float above characters' heads. We examined the congruity of face-upfix dyads presented sequentially with words describing their literal ("lightbulb") or non-literal meanings ("inspiration"). To examine if upfixes alone sponsor meanings, we showed participants upfixes that either matched or mismatched the facial expression (e.g., lightbulb over an excited vs. sad face). Literal words always evoked faster response times for face-upfix dyads when presented before the images. When images appeared before words, participants responded faster to non-literal words for matching dyads than mismatching dyads. On the other hand, when literal words appeared before images, participants responded faster to matching dyads than mismatching dyads. Non-literal words were rated as more congruous with matching dyads, while literal words were more congruous with mismatching dyads. Thus, non-literal upfix meanings (e.g., inspiration) are ingrained in memory only when they match facial expressions, supporting the notion that they belong to a constrained visual lexicon. Our study contributes a combinatorial method of both verbal and visual modalities into the study of non-literal expressions in memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.