ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Towards liquid biopsy on chip for Triple Negative Breast Cancer: preliminary results on monitoring circulating miRNA-21 using portable diagnostics.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual Paper-Based Electrochemical Device for Multiplex Detection of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer miRNA Signatures.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Electrochemical liquid biopsy across cancer care pathway.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Review
- Multiplex Detection and Quantification of miRNAs in Drug Delivery Systems Using a Signal-Off Electrochemical Platform.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: current biomarker platforms and clinical applications.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Paper Matters: Technical Evaluation of Paper-Based Substrates for Enhanced Preconcentration of Biomolecules in Liquid Biopsy Diagnostics.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising non-invasive, cost-effective and real-time approach for cancer diagnosis and monitoring, allowing for the detection of biomarkers in bodily fluids. Among these, microRNAs (miRNAs) are a valuable choice due to their stability and ability to reflect the tumor's heterogeneity. Concerning triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive subtype, several studies have demonstrated consistent upregulation of miRNA-21. Its elevated levels, linked to poor prognosis, make it valuable for early detection, risk stratification, and targeted therapies. While traditional miRNA quantification methods are accurate, they often require complex procedures and skilled personnel, limiting their accessibility in low-resource environments. These challenges can be addressed by electrochemical point-of-care (POC) platforms, inspired by the glucose strip, offering a good alternative by reducing matrix effects, integrating cost-effective and eco-friendly substrates. In this work, miRNA-21 was selectively detected using a complementary DNA probe modified with methylene blue, as a redox mediator, immobilized onto an AuNPs-functionalized, paper-based screen-printed electrode. Significant experimental parameters and sensor's selectivity were carefully evaluated, allowing miRNA-21 detection in both standard solution and human serum with limit of detection (LOD) 1.2 nM and satisfactory repeatability of about 8%. The platform's performance improved tenfold with an external paper-based origami pre-concentration device, enabling pM-level miRNA detection and advancing its potential for real clinical practice applications. The platform is envisioned as a starting point for developing accessible, rapid, cost-effective POC testing, with significant implications for personalized medicine and early TNBC detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.