ArticleOecologia2025
Experimental comparison of the genetic component of pollinator effectiveness in a shrub pollinated by birds, non-flying mammals and European honeybees.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attraction of nocturnal scarab beetles by unusual floral volatiles in a Banksia (Proteaceae) with functionally diverse pollinators.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The range and frequency of pollinator movement, influences patterns of pollen dispersal with consequences for plant mating. It is predicted that pollination by birds promotes outcrossing and multiple paternity. Alternatively, pollination by insects or non-flying mammals (NFMs) is expected to increase inbreeding and correlation of paternity, leading to less genetically diverse and less vigorous seedlings. We tested these predictions in Banksia catoglypta (Proteaceae)-an obligately outcrossing heathland shrub pollinated by honeyeater birds, NFMs (honey possums and rodents) and insects (mostly introduced Apis mellifera). Previous research employing selective pollinator exclusion determined that pollination by NFMs was associated with reduced fruit set, compared to flying pollinators. Here, we used microsatellite genotyping of seedling families and a common garden experiment to compare the effectiveness of bird, NFM, and insect pollinators in terms of the genetic quality and vigour of the resulting seedlings. Despite floral traits of B. catoglypta suggesting adaptation to mammalian pollinators, pollination solely by NFMs led to lower multilocus outcrossing rates (tm, indicating biparental inbreeding) and higher correlation of paternity (rp), compared to pollination by flying pollinators (birds and insects combined). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between pollination treatments and open-pollinated controls. Overall, seedling survival was positively correlated with individual heterozygosity, with seedlings resulting from pollination solely by NFMs least likely to survive, and exclusion of NFMs associated with increased seedling survival-although these effects were slight. Our results highlight the importance of quantifying plant mating and seedling fitness for understanding the consequences of pollination by different animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.