ArticlePharmaceutical research2025
Impact of Initial Aggregate Level on Aggregation Potential of Monoclonal Antibodies in Different Buffer Systems.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates the stability and kinetics of degradation when monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) process intermediates are stored in commonly used Protein A elution buffers, including citrate, acetate, and glycine, at varying pre-existing aggregates levels (low: 1-5%, moderate: 5-15% and high: 15-25%) at 4°C and 30°C to simulate standard and worst-case conditions. METHODOLOGY: mAb samples were subjected to thermal stress to achieve different levels of initial aggregates. The pre-aggregated samples were then incubated in different buffers at 4°C and 30°C to assess aggregation rates and stability. Aggregates were quantified using dynamic light scattering (DLS) integrated with machine learning (ML).
resultAt 30°C, half-life reductions for citrate, acetate, and glycine buffers were 6.30-fold, 6.48-fold, and 9.64-fold, respectively, compared to 4°C, with glycine buffer offering the best stability, while citrate buffer provides the least. At higher initial aggregate levels, half-lives decreased by 2.15-, 1.95-, and 1.73-fold for citrate, acetate, and glycine buffers, respectively, compared to lower initial aggregates. Second-order kinetics dominated in samples having lower initial aggregate levels, while first-order kinetics prevailed in medium and high initial aggregate levels. Glycine buffer at 4°C with low initial aggregates achieved the highest half-life of 129 days, whereas citrate buffer at 30°C with high initial aggregate exhibited the lowest stability, with a half-life of 3.5 days.
conclusionThe findings highlight the significance of using an optimal buffer system and appropriate storage conditions for in-process intermediates during mAb manufacturing to have a robust process that delivers safe and efficacious biotherapeutic products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40481298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.