Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481235›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Genetic alterations in coronary cell lines exposed to sirolimus and paclitaxel.

Elaine Aparecida de Camargo, Glenda Nicioli da Silva, João Paulo de Castro Marcondes, David Corrêa Martins, Wilson Nadruz, Roberto Schreiber, Décio Salvadori, Daisy Maria Fávero Salvadori

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elaine Aparecida de CamargoDepartment of Pathology, Medical School, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Rubião Junior, Botucatu, SP, 18618-687, Brazil.
Glenda Nicioli da SilvaSchool of Pharmacy, UFOP - Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
João Paulo de Castro MarcondesCESMAC - University Center, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
David Corrêa MartinsCenter of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition, UFABC - Federal University of ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Wilson NadruzSchool of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP - University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Roberto SchreiberSchool of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP - University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Décio SalvadoriBP - Beneficência Portuguesa Hospital of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Daisy Maria Fávero SalvadoriDepartment of Pathology, Medical School, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Rubião Junior, Botucatu, SP, 18618-687, Brazil. daisy.salvadori@unesp.br.ORCID 0000-0001-9751-3379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angioplasties using drug-eluting stents remain the most common and effective intervention for coronary artery disease. However, in-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to be the leading cause of stent failure following percutaneous coronary intervention, accounting for 5-10% of all clinical intervention procedures. This study aimed to investigate the potential molecular mechanisms involved in the development of in-stent restenosis. The cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and transcriptional changes induced by sirolimus, paclitaxel, and mechanical stress were assessed in human coronary artery endothelial and smooth muscle cell lines. Both drugs were similarly effective in suppressing cell growth in these cell lines at different stages of the cell cycle. However, while paclitaxel primarily induced apoptosis, sirolimus caused cell death mainly through necrosis. Additionally, both drugs exhibited genotoxic effects, primarily increasing the levels of oxidized DNA nucleotide bases. Transcriptome analysis identified 23 differentially expressed genes with known biological functions in the chemically treated groups. Interestingly, transcriptomic alterations were also observed in coronary cells subjected solely to mechanical stress. In conclusion, our data confirm that sirolimus and paclitaxel inhibit cell proliferation through distinct mechanisms. Nonetheless, their genotoxic potential appears to act as a stimulus for cell proliferation, thereby increasing the risk of restenosis.

Indexed as

Coronary VesselsMyocytes, Smooth MusclePaclitaxelSirolimusApoptosisCell LineCell ProliferationCoronary RestenosisDNA DamageDrug-Eluting StentsEndothelial CellsGene Expression ProfilingHumansTranscriptomePaclitaxelSirolimusEndothelial and smooth muscle cellsGene expression profileGenotoxicityPaclitaxelSirolimus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.