Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481227›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2025

Noninvasive reduction of neural rigidity alters autistic behaviors in humans.

Takamitsu Watanabe, Hidenori Yamasue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takamitsu WatanabeInternational Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, Tokyo, Japan. takamitsu-watanabe@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6873
Hidenori YamasueDepartment of Psychiatry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu City, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2748-6317

Funding

MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPJ012425MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPMJFR2321MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPMJMS2021MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 19H03535MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 21H05679MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 23H04217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autistic behaviors correlate with reductions in specific brain-state transitions in global neural dynamics, implying that the mitigation of such rigid brain dynamics may alter autistic traits. To examine this possibility, we investigated longitudinal behavioral effects of state-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in autistic adults. We found that excitatory TMS over the right parietal lobule decreased neural rigidity, which commensurately reduced social and nonsocial autistic behaviors. Specifically, TMS-induced neural flexibility immediately decreased cognitive inflexibility and slowly reduced overstable perception and atypical nonverbal communication. In particular, perceptual overstability was reduced after TMS-induced neural flexibility strengthened the coupling between the frontoparietal and visual networks, whereas atypical nonverbal communication became less explicit when the neural flexibility enhanced the coupling between the frontoparietal, default mode and salience networks. These results indicate that alteration of neural rigidity could change multiple autistic traits.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderBrainParietal LobeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40481227
PMCPMC12148933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.