ArticleScientific reports2025
Toward the standardization of big datasets of urine output for AKI analysis: a multicenter validation study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a multivariable clinical prediction model for acute kidney injury after valve replacement surgery: incremental value of the triglyceride-glucose body mass index.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Concordance Analysis Between KDIGO Definition of Acute Kidney Injury and Its Coding in Clinical Practice.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- National variation in acute kidney injury diagnosis and monitoring across adult intensive care units in china: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Explainable AI identifies key biomarkers for acute kidney injury prediction in the ICU.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a prevalent condition in ICU patients. However, inconsistencies in urine charting and guideline interpretations hinder accurate diagnosis and research. This study aimed to derive and validate a standardization for the processing of big urine output datasets to improve consistency in AKI diagnosis and staging. Using a derivation cohort from 14 ICUs at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2008-2019) and a validation cohort from an academic center in Amsterdam (2003-2016), we developed and validated an algorithm for computing hourly urine output rates and identifying oliguric AKI across its definitions. Peak AKI stages computed using the method were significantly associated with all clinical outcomes, including severity scores, serum creatinine levels, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, renal replacement therapy requirements, and hospital mortality (all p < 0.001). Adjusted 30-day mortality odds ratios for AKI stages 1-3 were 1.58, 2.93, and 5.24 in the derivation cohort and 2.91, 5.16, and 13.59 in the validation cohort (all p < 0.001). Tested on over 85,000 multinational ICU admissions, this approach demonstrated robust performance and consistent results across diverse settings; it has the potential to enhance clinical practice through e-alerts and support future AKI and fluid balance research, including ML model training and inference. Supported by open-source code, the proposed method advances the standardization of AKI diagnostic criteria and can be applied to other EHR-based databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.